Leave a comment
Essays

greghills:

Okay, is this blogger being ironic or not?

 fascinated:

A must-read.

Every review on Amazon is super positive, and seemingly genuine…Wikipedia says its sold a million copies. A quote from one of the reviews:

“And this rigid upbringing might actually prevent them from truly seeing women as equals. For instance: men are rigidly trained never to hit a woman. Why? Because she is a delicate flower that he could easily crush. In truth, people should not hit anyone, and if they must, only in self-defense (not just ego defense). The perpetuating of the “delicate flower” myth (yes, myth, because some women are boxing champions) hurts women as well as men. Just as women are typecast as sex-symbols, this book deals with the typecasts of men; as money-maker, or protector/defender (which encourages his violence, rather than more peaceful strategies or show of emotion). It also talks about homophobia and inability to cry or act feminine; destroying the wholeness of a man’s person.”

This is some far out, explosive stuff! And it looks like this isn’t just an internet meme.

I went to a pretty liberal college and, still, I had never heard of men’s liberation. Browsing through it now, I’m not surprised though. Anyone who started advocating these ideas outside of a gender studies class, without attributing them to a credible gender studies professor, would seem like they’re mocking feminism or just bat shit crazy.   


It seems like gender issues will never be anything but supremely interesting. I don’t have enough skin in the game to get fired up (good or bad) about this, but it’s certainly interesting.

Marco.org: Google’s decreasingly useful, spam-filled web search

Leave a comment
Essays

marco:

Jeff Atwood, in Trouble In the House of Google:

People whose opinions I respect have all been echoing the same sentiment — Google, the once essential tool, is somehow losing its edge. The spammers, scrapers, and SEO’ed-to-the-hilt content farms are winning.

(via Anil Dash’s nice roundup

Everybody’s had their chance to chime in on the SEO-hating and on Google becoming spammy and losing relevance, but just because an idea is vogue doesn’t mean it’s not right. What most people haven’t been talking about is who will replace them, or where the disruption will come from. That’s what I’m most curious about. My money is on Facebook and Twitter. While Twitter still apparently needs to sort out its existential confusion – are they an information network? are they creating a social graph? – it and Facebook are putting together a living, breathing, social data set that can serve as a powerful foundation for search. The notion of an algorithm that draws from the linkages across the internet was an extremely powerful one, but the notion of an algorithm that draws from the linkages between people is ever more so.

Marco.org: Google’s decreasingly useful, spam-filled web search