Leave a comment
Essays

Read these, in this order. Love this type of talk: http://bit.ly/8X9uDG, http://bit.ly/9yBFlf, http://bit.ly/aWcPFW (via @ezraklein @cdixon) I very clearly remember going to my Goldman Sachs interview, winter of Junior year, and thinking to myself, wow I could not have less interest in investment banking if I tried. But everyone else is doing it, it’s a lot of money, it’s safe, and it’s competitive as hell and really well marketed. A few short weeks later I’d be leaving Stanford, diving headfirst into the world of startups, and I’m all the wiser and grateful for it.

Leave a comment
Essays

Investor Acronyms of the day: ZOPA (Zone of Possible Agreement) BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement) and NAMBLA (I kid, I kid. Get it? I kid? Sorry.)

Leave a comment
Essays

Virgin Greenfund quietly investing in later stage Cleantech Start-ups: http://nyti.ms/dbZNoi I’ve been trying, for almost a year now, to figure out whether or not Venture Capital is in fact still a relevant asset class. My friend Adam suggests that it’s not. Not sure I agree, or that I understand why. Recently published research from the Kaufman Foundation suggests that since the boom of venture capital from 1980 or so, there hasn’t been a rise in total job creation, so maybe he’s right. Should there just be a community of angels, convertible notes and traditional loans for growth capital, and a secondary market in the relevant industry (the fact that there isn’t a secondary market that is well-policed but allows for company shares to be traded hurts innovation. Sometimes adding additional layers of complexity results in corruption – read: speculative commodities markets – but not in this case, I don’t think)? The linked article isn’t in any way relevant to this question. Just musing.

On the Modern Man

Leave a comment
Essays

I submitted this short opinion piece to the 48hrmag.com project, and it wasn’t selected, as the other writers were all way better than me, and I’m looking forward to reading the magazine when it comes out, as should you. But I want to share my thoughts anyway. More to come, of course.


The Masculine Mystique: Why it’s time to stop watching ESPN, and time to start hustling


Gentlemen: we’ve got a problem. In many ways, this article is, in and of itself, a fallacy. There is no need, really, for an exposition on the plight of the our gender. To even presume such need will, as it must, be treated as an act of treachery against a very worthwhile institution. It’s not meant to be. The statistics remain deeply troubling, especially in my vocational community, which is that of start-ups, early stage equity investing, and technology. I am optimistic about a future where the state of employment in this country does in fact reflect our reality, wherein there are more girls than guys enrolling in schools, completing higher education degrees, and generally kicking ass. The true meritocracy is in the horizon’s rising sun, and we aren’t moving East towards it quickly enough. But this article isn’t about jobs. It’s about romance. And boy, we could really use a hand.


To properly describe our dilemma, we start from the beginning. As evolutionary biologists largely agree, the genders of homo sapiens served complimentary and distinct reproductive purposes. While mystical lore often starts the human story with Man, it in fact starts with Woman. She was tasked with carrying the baby, and as such was oriented towards selecting seed that would maximize her offspring’s chance of survival. Men, and humanity at large, are dependent on women for their wombs, so have to impress them with our breadwinning ability, to win their favor over our peers, with the ultimate goal of their selection. When breadwinning was largely a physical exercise, it was easy. We’re bigger, we’re faster, we’re stronger. These days, it’s not so simple. Thanks to technology, humans have become masters of our universe. Society is no longer driven with physical strength, but instead intellectual strength. We don’t have the edge any more (and if graduation stats are any measure, we are in fact inferior). So how, then, do we impress?


Or, another angle: in modern society, we look for narrative in romance. Our obsession with, and addiction to, popular culture, in fiction, cinema, and magazines, has us yearning, unconsciously or not, for stories like those of Ilsa Lund and Lizzy Bennett– of Daisy Buchanan and Brett Ashley– of Blair Waldorf and Carrie Bradshaw. In our men, whether they succeed or fail, in comedy and in tragedy, we want stoics, with inordinate wealth, imposing personas, physically and culturally, and deep flaws of the heart. In short, and in lockstep with our evolution: we have bred a frenzy for alphas. But in a post-feminist era, all notions of traditional alpha dominance are also passé. Real relationships are fluid, definitional roles and archetypes are outmoded. Women have begun to eclipse men, in terms of earning potential (though real wages coninue to lag). If the narrative requires one thing, and the reality suggests another, what to do?


It seems, in either interpretation, that men are cosmically trapped. The rules of engagement are a paradox, a contradiction; our evolutionary advantages have eroded without being replaced; and we’re grooming a generation of young men who are under performing next to their female peers. So, take heed. It’s time to dig deep, gentlemen; to learn what makes the modern man tick, to find our place. It’s time to hustle.

Leave a comment
Essays

hypem:

twentyfourbit:

Watch: PS22 Chorus Covers Björk – “All Is Full of Love”

Phew. The adorable PS22 Chorus is back on track after being disconcertingly “co-opted by viral marketers” for a moment there. A lot has gone down since we last raved about their cover of Phoenix’s “Lisztomania,” which hit the blogosphere by storm in early March—namely, the PS22 kids have since covered Beach House with their pony-tailed teacher, Gregg Breinberg, Toad the Wet Sprocket(?), Marina & the Diamonds, and more.

Here’s their latest: Björk’s “All Is Full of Love” from her 1997 album Homogenic.